Winamp question?

C

CF Mark

Administrator
The WA3 plugin is actually pretty useless.
It does pass on track time and remaining time, and a few other things, but it doesnt give the track title.

I can try and find it if your still interested.
 
D

Darksaint

New member
If you could that would be absolutly great.
I just really like winamp 3 much more than 2. The menu is much faster and i like how everything is broken in to album and artist.
You guys should really try to get winamp 3 compatiablity in the next few months.

I do love the lcd conrol though.
:)
 
H

HellBoy

New member
WinaMP3 sucks arse, I'm using WinAmp 2.91, it got the playlist and album/artist handling from WinaMP3, and it's not as unstable as WinaMP3.

They tried to be an all-in-one multimedia application, and failed miserably - I'd much rather use Windows Media Player 9, than Nullsoft's newest piece of shite. Long live winamp 2.x :)
 
S

SIGNOSIS

New member
Interesting. Most people ive known or aquaintenced with use Winamp3. Though its more resource intensive than Winamp2, I really don't find any huge difference at all. The skins and options/features for Winamp3 outweight Winamp2 IMO. But, guess It just comes down to overall personal preference. :)
 
F

fairyliquidizer

New member
Winamp 3 is being EOLed. Winamp 2.9 is going to have the free form skins on Winamp 3 merged into it to produce Winamp 5 (provisional name). A later version may have support for WASABI, but not initial release.

So they finally realised that Winamp2 rocks and 3 ehm looks nice.

Fairy
 
C

CF Mark

Administrator
Well Nulsoft themselves probably think WA3 is still better.

But im thinking thier WA2 and WA3 download counters prove them to be wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top