S supermanu New member Sep 13, 2002 #1 I can't add a new screen or configure a screen with this version. Crystalfontz LCD BlogLooking for additional LCD resources? Check out our LCD blog for the latest developments in LCD technology.
I can't add a new screen or configure a screen with this version. Crystalfontz LCD BlogLooking for additional LCD resources? Check out our LCD blog for the latest developments in LCD technology.
C CF Mark Administrator Sep 14, 2002 #2 what processor are you running in your PC? and what version of windows?
S supermanu New member Sep 14, 2002 #3 Problem I have windows XP PRO with SP1. My processor is an ATHLON XP 1600 +. I don't have any problem the previous version.
Problem I have windows XP PRO with SP1. My processor is an ATHLON XP 1600 +. I don't have any problem the previous version.
S supermanu New member Sep 15, 2002 #5 When i click on "add new screen" or "configure screen" nothing happen. The CPU run at 99% indefinitely and I must close the soft.
When i click on "add new screen" or "configure screen" nothing happen. The CPU run at 99% indefinitely and I must close the soft.
F ForNeverEnding New member Sep 16, 2002 #7 Same symptoms i'm having with my MP machine...maybe our problem is the same.
C CF Mark Administrator Sep 17, 2002 #8 Is it possible that one of you guys can watch the memory usage of CrystalControl while its stuck trying to create the screen config dialog?
Is it possible that one of you guys can watch the memory usage of CrystalControl while its stuck trying to create the screen config dialog?
F ForNeverEnding New member Sep 18, 2002 #9 when i start CC: 1,016 k when i open up settings: 2,168 k when i click 'add' button: 2,352 once i configure, click test: 2476 k exit out, then click 'add new screen' : 23,744 k (takes a few sec to climb that high)
when i start CC: 1,016 k when i open up settings: 2,168 k when i click 'add' button: 2,352 once i configure, click test: 2476 k exit out, then click 'add new screen' : 23,744 k (takes a few sec to climb that high)
C CF Mark Administrator Sep 18, 2002 #10 Ok thanks. Seems that thre is somthing wrong with the new perfmon information.